Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Cabezas Mojón, Jessica | es |
dc.contributor.author | Barona Dorado, Cristina | es |
dc.contributor.author | Gómez Moreno, Gerardo | es |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández Cáliz, Fernando | es |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez González, José María | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-26T06:40:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-26T06:40:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Cabezas Mojón, Jessica ; Barona Dorado, Cristina ; Gómez Moreno, Gerardo ; Fernández Cáliz, Fernando ; Martínez González, José María. Meta-analytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 1 2012: 28- | es |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate graft types used for maxillary sinus augmentation and review success rates of dental implants inserted in these areas, analyzing the graft materials used, implant surface types and the moment of implant placement. Study Design: A meta-analytic study reviewing articles on sinus augmentation published during the last ten years. Results: 3,975 implants placed in sinus augmentations (with bony windows) were registered, of which 3,749 implants survived, a survival rate of 94.3%. Conclusions: When performing sinus augmentation, bone substitute materials are just as effective as autologous bone, whether used alone or in combination with autologous bone. Implant surface treatments can have an important effect on implant survival and it would appear that roughened surfaces are the best option. When implants are inserted simultaneously to grafting, a higher failure rate can be expected. © Medicina Oral S. L. | es |
dc.title | Meta-analytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation | es |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4317/medoral.16920 | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |