NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at Finding Spanish Articles in Repositories

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at Finding Spanish Articles in Repositories

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Abad García, María Francisca
dc.contributor.author González Teruel, Aurora
dc.contributor.author González Linares, Javier
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-19T08:11:00Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-19T08:11:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Abad García, Maria Francisca González Teruel, Aurora González Linares, Javier 2018 Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at Finding Spanish Articles in Repositories Journal Of The Association For Information Science And Technology 69 4 619 622
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/68306
dc.description.abstract This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Journal Of The Association For Information Science And Technology, 2018, vol. 69, num. 4, p. 619-622
dc.subject Comunicació científica
dc.title Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at Finding Spanish Articles in Repositories
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.date.updated 2018-12-19T08:11:01Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/asi.23975
dc.identifier.idgrec 123902
dc.rights.accessRights open access es_ES

Visualització       (439.6Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques