NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Castillo Martínez, Carolina del Carmen es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-05T09:17:28Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-05T09:17:28Z
dc.date.issued 2021 es
dc.identifier.citation Castillo Martínez, Carolina del Carmen. Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo. En: Revista Boliviana de Derecho, 31 2021: 132-159 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79158
dc.description.abstract The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9, 2020 comes to answer the five questions that, in its preliminary question, the Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clauses, establishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16, 2017, in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement and, subsequently, those of April 11, 2018 and September 13, 2018 in the opposite direction, declaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and insistently commented resolution after its publication, in attention, no doubt, both to its well-founded substantive relevance - due to the legal doctrine that it consolidates and which results from unquestionable application, and its economic repercussion - as well as its procedural significance. -by the consequence of the lifting of procedural suspensions that its dictation supposes, agreed as a result of the ruling of the Luxembourg Court-. In this paper I will review the doctrine contained in the STJUE in its comparison with the one previously declared by our Supreme Court, in order to conclude what its incidence is with respect to the criterion maintained by our High Court in its Judgments of April 11, 2018 and September 13, 2018. es
dc.subject 2070-8157 22082 Revista Boliviana de Derecho 565487 2021 31 7730055 Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo Castillo Martínez es
dc.subject Carolina del Carmen The Sentence of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 9 es
dc.subject 2020 comes to answer the five questions that es
dc.subject in its preliminary question es
dc.subject the Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 3 of Teruel asks about the validity of the new agreements in the context of the floor clauses es
dc.subject establishing jurisprudential doctrine on this matter about which our Supreme Court had previously ruled in its Judgments of October 16 es
dc.subject 2017 es
dc.subject in the sense of considering the agreed floor clause null as a consequence of the novation agreement and es
dc.subject subsequently es
dc.subject those of April 11 es
dc.subject 2018 and September 13 es
dc.subject 2018 in the opposite direction es
dc.subject declaring that the novation agreement was valid. It is a long-awaited and insistently commented resolution after its publication es
dc.subject in attention es
dc.subject no doubt es
dc.subject both to its well-founded substantive relevance - due to the legal doctrine that it consolidates and which results from unquestionable application es
dc.subject and its economic repercussion - as well as its procedural significance. -by the consequence of the lifting of procedural suspensions that its dictation supposes es
dc.subject agreed as a result of the ruling of the Luxembourg Court-. In this paper I will review the doctrine contained in the STJUE in its comparison with the one previously declared by our Supreme Court es
dc.subject in order to conclude what its incidence is with respect to the criterion maintained by our High Court in its Judgments of April 11 es
dc.subject 2018 and September 13 es
dc.subject 2018. Hipoteca es
dc.subject cláusula suelo es
dc.subject pacto novatorio es
dc.subject consumidor es
dc.subject interés remuneratorio es
dc.subject variabilidad del interés. es
dc.subject Mortgage es
dc.subject floor clause es
dc.subject new agreement es
dc.subject consumer es
dc.subject remunerative interest es
dc.subject interest variability 132 159 es
dc.title Algunas reflexiones acerca de la stjue de 9 de julio de 2020 sobre los pactos novatorios en materia de cláusulas suelo es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (415.0Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques