NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?:a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.author	Yu, Jianfeng	es
dc.contributor.author	Liu, Siyan	es
dc.contributor.author	Zhang, Xiao	es
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-16T08:36:45Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-16T08:36:45Z
dc.date.issued	2021	es
dc.identifier.citation	Yu, J., Liu, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. En Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal (pp. e754-e761). Medicina Oral, S.L. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24726	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88083
dc.description.abstract	It is unclear if buccal articaine infiltration can be used as an alternative to standard inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for treating mandibular molars in pediatric patients. Therefore, this study aimed to pool evidence to compare the efficacy of buccal infiltration of articaine vs IANB with lignocaine for pediatric dental procedures. We searched the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two techniques in pediatric patients and reporting the success of anesthesia and/or pain during treatment. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Seven RCTs were included. Pooled analysis of five studies indicated no statistically significant difference in the success rates of the two anesthetic techniques (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.13, 7.96; I2=69%, p=0.98). Meta-analysis of data from the four studies demonstrated no statistically significant difference in pain during the procedure with buccal infiltration of articaine or IANB with lignocaine (SMD: 0.62; 95% CI: -1.37, 0.12; I2=88%, p=0.10). Evidence suggests that buccal infiltration of articaine is a viable alternative to IANB with lignocaine in pediatric patients for treating mandibular molars. Based on the confidence intervals, there may be a tendency of higher success rates with buccal infiltration of articaine.	es
dc.subject	xerostomia	es
dc.subject	systemic pathology	es
dc.subject	oral health	es
dc.subject	obesity	es
dc.subject	geriatrics	es
dc.title	Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?:a systematic review and meta-analysis	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.4317/medoral.24726	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.identifier.url	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601637/