NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

The triumph of partisanship: political scientists in the public debate about Catalonia’s independence crisis (2010–2018)

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

The triumph of partisanship: political scientists in the public debate about Catalonia’s independence crisis (2010–2018)

dc.contributor.author	Real Dato, José
dc.contributor.author	Rodríguez Teruel, Juan
dc.contributor.author	Martínez Pastor, Esther
dc.contributor.author	Estévez-Toledo, Esperanza
dc.date.accessioned	2023-07-10T09:03:34Z
dc.date.available	2023-07-11T04:45:08Z
dc.date.issued	2022	es_ES
dc.identifier.citation	Real Dato, J., Rodríguez Teruel, J., Martínez Pastor, E. et al. The triumph of partisanship: political scientists in the public debate about Catalonia’s independence crisis (2010–2018). Eur Polit Sci 21, 37–57 (2022).	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88670
dc.description.abstract	Participation in the public debate constitutes one of the most evident avenues for political scientists to demonstrate the social relevance of the discipline. This article focuses on two questions: the types of roles political scientists adopt in their public interventions and the potential tensions between their public engagement and the epistemic norms regulating academic and research activities. We investigate these questions in the context of very salient political debates, involving a high degree of political confrontation, where basic political beliefs, values, identities, and interests are at stake. Focusing on the case of the public debate surrounding the Catalan inde pendence crisis (2010–2018), we demonstrate that in this type of context, (1) politi cal scientists mostly adopt a partisan stance in their public interventions, yet it is also frequent that this is combined with the presence of academic elements in their discourse; (2) demand side factors (media outlets’ editorial lines) reinforce these partisan dynamics. These fndings show that opportunities for increasing the social relevance of political scientists in these highly contentious contexts might come at the price of creating tensions that could erode the legitimacy of political science knowledge before the public.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Springer Link	es_ES
dc.subject	catalonia	es_ES
dc.subject	media systems	es_ES
dc.subject	partisan intellectuals	es_ES
dc.subject	qualitative content analysis	es_ES
dc.subject	relevance of political science	es_ES
dc.subject	roles of political scientists	es_ES
dc.subject	secession	es_ES
dc.subject	Spain	es_ES
dc.title	The triumph of partisanship: political scientists in the public debate about Catalonia’s independence crisis (2010–2018)	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS Y DERECHO	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.1057/s41304-021-00341-x	es_ES
dc.accrualmethod	S	es_ES
dc.embargo.terms	0 days	es_ES
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES