NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review

dc.contributor.author	Diniz Azevedo, Vinicius
dc.contributor.author	Márcia Ferreira Silva, Regina
dc.contributor.author	de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina
dc.contributor.author	Valadão Fernades, Michele da Silva
dc.contributor.author	Miñana-Signes, Vicente
dc.contributor.author	Monfort-Pañego, Manuel
dc.contributor.author	Rayanne E. Silva Noll, Priscilla
dc.contributor.author	Noll, Matias
dc.date.accessioned	2023-11-08T11:24:22Z
dc.date.available	2023-11-08T11:24:22Z
dc.date.issued	2023
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/91001
dc.description.abstract	Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This study aimed to review validated questionnaires that have assessed back pain in athletes. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) by searching the databases Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus. The articles were selected regardless of language and date of publication. Titles and abstracts were independently selected by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. All the steps were conducted using the software Rayyan. The methodological quality of the questionnaire validation articles was assessed using a critical appraisal tool checklist proposed by Brink and Louw. The search returned 4748 articles, of which 60 were selected for this review, including 5 questionnaire validation studies. These articles were published between 2004 and 2022, which were performed in more than 20 countries, particularly Germany (14) and Sweden (5). Thirteen different instruments were identified, of which 46.1% were developed in Europe. The most commonly used questionnaires were the Oswestry Disability Index and Nordic Standardized Questionnaire. In addition, five questionnaire validation studies were selected for methodological quality assessment, with only two studies demonstrating high methodological quality. The following three instruments were identified for assessing back pain specifically in athletes: Micheli Functional Scale, Persian Functional Rating Index, and Athlete Disability Index. This review confirmed that all three instruments were specifically designed to assess this condition.
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.relation.ispartof	Plos One, 2023, vol. 18, num. 11, p. 1-22
dc.source	Diniz Azevedo, Vinicius Márcia Ferreira Silva, Regina de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Valadão Fernades, Michele da Silva Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Rayanne E. Silva Noll, Priscilla Noll, Matias 2023 Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review Plos One 18 11 1 22
dc.subject	Atletisme Entrenament
dc.title	Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
dc.type	journal article
dc.date.updated	2023-11-08T11:24:23Z
dc.identifier.doi	10.1371/journal.pone.0293333
dc.identifier.idgrec	161762
dc.rights.accessRights	open access