NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Marginal bone loss in relation to platform switching implant insertion depth: an update

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Marginal bone loss in relation to platform switching implant insertion depth: an update

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Alonso González, Rocío es
dc.contributor.author Aloy Prósper, Amparo es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-05-21T12:44:14Z
dc.date.available 2014-05-21T12:44:14Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Alonso González, Rocío ; Aloy Prósper, Amparo ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Marginal bone loss in relation to platform switching implant insertion depth: an update. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2012, Vol. 4, No. 3: 173-179 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35260
dc.description.abstract A review is made, analyzing marginal bone loss in relation to the depth of implant insertion with platform switching, according to the position of the neck (supracrestal, crestal or subcrestal), and evaluating survival of the implants. A PubMed search was made of the studies in animals and humans published between 2005 and 2011, specifying platform insertion depth (supracrestal, crestal or subcrestal) and registering marginal bone loss from the time of prosthetic restoration to the end of follow-up (minimum 6 months). A total of 30 studies were included. The bone loss associated with implants placed at supracrestal level was slightly smaller than in the case of implants placed at subcrestal level, though statistical significance was not reached. The mean marginal bone loss values were 0.0 mm to 0.9±0.4 mm for the implants with the neck located at supracrestal level; 0.05 mm to 1.40±0.50 mm for those at subcrestal level; and 0.26±0.22 mm to 1.8±0.39 mm for those in a crestal location, after 6-60 months of follow-up. The survival rate was 88.6-100% for the implants with the neck positioned at crestal level, versus 98.3- 100% below the crest, and 100% above the crest. The heterogeneity of the studies (surgical technique, platform surface texture, radiographic measurement techniques, etc.) made it difficult to establish a relationship between marginal bone loss and the supracrestal, crestal or subcrestal location of platform switching. en_US
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Marginal bone loss in relation to platform switching implant insertion depth: an update es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (438.0Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques