NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts

dc.contributor.author	Monje, Alberto	es
dc.contributor.author	Monje Gil, Florencio	es
dc.contributor.author	Suárez, Fernando	es
dc.contributor.author	González García, R.	es
dc.contributor.author	Villanueva Alcojol, Laura	es
dc.contributor.author	Nogales, A.G.	es
dc.contributor.author	Galindo Moreno, Pablo	es
dc.contributor.author	Wang, Hom-Lay	es
dc.date.accessioned	2014-05-29T07:05:55Z
dc.date.available	2014-05-29T07:05:55Z
dc.date.issued	2013	es
dc.identifier.citation	Monje, Alberto ; Monje Gil, Florencio ; Suárez, Fernando ; González García, R. ; Villanueva Alcojol, Laura ; Nogales, A.G. ; Galindo Moreno, Pablo ; Wang, Hom-Lay. Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 3: 449-454	es
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/35630
dc.description.abstract	Purpose: The purposes of the present study were: to compare the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values of implant placed in either ramus or calvaria block grafts; and to determine if implant diameter influences RFA implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 16 consecutives healthy patients treated with autogenous onlay block grafts for horizontal bone reconstruction in maxilla. Ten ramus and ten calvaria block graft treated patients were selected and compared. Results: Totally, 59 implants were placed, 35 (59.3%) were placed on the calvaria bone grafts and the remaining 24 (40.7%) were on the ramus bone graft. Of all the implants studied, 13 (22%), 35 (59.3%), and 11 (18.6%) were 10 mm, 11.5 mm and 13 mm in length respectively. Regarding the diameter, 4 (7%) were 3.3 mm, 3 (5%) were 3.5 mm, 20 (34%) were 3.7 mm and 32 (54%) were 4 mm. Mean ISQ value obtained by RFA was 73.06 ± 6.08, being 72.19 ± 6 and 74.47 ± 6.06 for the calvaria and ramus treated group respectively. No significant differences were noted between the two groups (p= 0.154). Implants were pooled and divided by their diameter. Mean ISQ value obtained for 3.3 mm was 80 ± 5.09, while for 4.0 mm was 72.5 ± 7.19. Again, no significant differences were found among the groups (p= 0.138). Conclusion: For RFA ISQ value, the bone graft origins (calvaria or ramus) or implant diameters did not influence the outcome.	en_US
dc.subject	Odontología	es
dc.subject	Ciencias de la salud	es
dc.title	Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES