NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession: comparative, split mouth, six months study

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession: comparative, split mouth, six months study

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Trivedi, Sakshee R. es
dc.contributor.author Bhavsar, Neeta V. es
dc.contributor.author Dulani, Kirti es
dc.contributor.author Trivedi, Rahul es
dc.date.accessioned 2014-09-17T10:58:03Z
dc.date.available 2014-09-17T10:58:03Z
dc.date.issued 2014 es
dc.identifier.citation Trivedi, Sakshee R. ; Bhavsar, Neeta V. ; Dulani, Kirti ; Trivedi, Rahul. Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession: comparative, split mouth, six months study. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2014, Vol. 6, No. 3: 218-224 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/37955
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The present study aims to clinically compare and evaluate subepithelial connective tissue graft and the GTR based root coverage in treatment of Miller's Class I gingival recession. Study Design: 30 patients with at least one pair of Miller's Class I gingival recession were treated either with Sube - pithelial connective tissue graft (Group A) or Guided tissue regeneration (Group B). Clinical parameters monitored included recession RD, width of keratinized gingiva (KG), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), attached gingiva (AG), residual probing depth (RPD) and % of Root coverage(%RC). Measurements were taken at baseline, three months and six months. A standard surgical procedure was used for both Group A and Group B. Data were recorded and statistical analysis was done for both intergroup and intragroup. Results: At end of six months % RC obtained were 84.47% (Group A) and 81.67% (Group B). Both treatments resulted in statistically significant improvement in clinical parameters. When compared, no statistically significant difference was found between both groups except in RPD, where it was significantly greater in Group A. Conclusions: GTR technique has advantages over subepithelial connective tissue graft for shallow Miller's Class I defects and this procedure can be used to avoid patient discomfort and reduce treatment time. en_US
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession: comparative, split mouth, six months study es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (461.5Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques