NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO
La caja negra de la teoría del haz: desafíos explicativos para la teoría de la sustancia como haz de propiedades
Repositori DSpace/Manakin
- Inici
- Investigació
- Revistes
- Quaderns de Filosofia
- Quaderns de Filosofia. 2014. Vol. 1, no. 2
- Visualitza element
IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/
La caja negra de la teoría del haz: desafíos explicativos para la teoría de la sustancia como haz de propiedades
Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
| dc.contributor.author | García, Robert | ca |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-11-26T11:24:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-11-26T11:24:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | es |
| dc.identifier.citation | García, Robert. La caja negra de la teoría del haz: desafíos explicativos para la teoría de la sustancia como haz de propiedades. Quaderns de Filosofia; Vol 1, No 2 (2014). | ca |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10550/40206 | |
| dc.description.abstract | My aim in this article is to contribute to the larger project of assessing the relative merits of different theories of substance. An important preliminary step in this project is assessing the explanatory resources of one main theory of subs- tance, the so-called bundle theory. This article works towards such an assessment. I identify and explain three distinct explanatory challenges an adequate bundle theory must meet. Each points to a putative explanatory gap, so I call them the ex- planatory challenges. I consider three bundle-theoretic strategies for meeting these challenges. I argue that none of them goes very far. The upshot is that, absent other strategies for meeting the challenges, bundle theory involves a significant amount of stipulation. This black box makes bundle theory relatively weak with respect to its explanatory power—unless, of course, rival theories of substance are unable to do better. | es |
| dc.rights | Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). | es |
| dc.title | La caja negra de la teoría del haz: desafíos explicativos para la teoría de la sustancia como haz de propiedades | es |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.url | https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/qfilosofia/article/view/4109 | es |
Visualització
(157.6Kb)