NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Abu-Mostafa, Nedal es
dc.contributor.author Alqahtani, Abdullah es
dc.contributor.author Abu Hasna, Mohammed es
dc.contributor.author Alhokail, Ahmed es
dc.contributor.author Aladsani, Ammar es
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-27T11:53:03Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-27T11:53:03Z
dc.date.issued 2015 es
dc.identifier.citation Abu-Mostafa, Nedal ; Alqahtani, Abdullah ; Abu Hasna, Mohammed ; Alhokail, Ahmed ; Aladsani, Ammar. A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2015, Vol. 20, No. 1: 15- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/43611
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To evaluate socket healing, incidence of acute alveolar ostieitis (AO) and associated pain following single molar tooth extraction in patients who receive intra-alveolar 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel, and those who rinsed with 0.12 % CHX rinse. Study Design: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on two parallel groups of patients. Group1 (141 patients): Rinsed with 0.12 % CHX rinse from the second postoperative day, two times daily for a week. Group2 (160 patients): Who had direct intra-alveolar application of 0.2% CHX gel and day 3 post-operatively. The socket was evaluated 3 and 7 day postoperatively for the presence of AO by checking probing tenderness in the socket, empty socket, food debris, halitosis and pain assessment by VAS. Results: Forty-eight AO cases were diagnosed out of 301 extractions (15.9%). In Group1, 25 cases were found (17.7%) while 23 cases were found in Group2 (14.4%). The difference was not statistically significant ( p =0.428). Presence of empty socket and food debris in Group1 were higher than in Group2 but the difference was not sta - tistically significant ( p = 0.390 & p = 0.415). Occurrence of halitosis in Group2 was more than Group1, but the difference was not significant ( p = 0.440). Statistical significance was found between AO in extraction done by root separation (29%) and those routinely extracted (12.3 %) ( p =0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative evaluation of molar extraction sockets that received direct intra-alveolar application of 0.2% CHX gel showed insignificant less occurrence of AO when compared with 0.12 % CHX rinse en_US
dc.subject Odontología es
dc.subject Ciencias de la salud es
dc.title A randomized clinical trial compared the effect of intra-alveolar 0.2 % Chlorohexidine bio-adhesive gel versus 0.12% Chlorohexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis following molar teeth extractions es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES
dc.identifier.url http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/citart?info=link&codigo=4984288&orden=0 es

Visualització       (323.5Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques