NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model

dc.contributor.author	Baires Campos, Felipe Eduardo	es
dc.contributor.author	Jimbo, Ryo	es
dc.contributor.author	Bonfante, Estevam A.	es
dc.contributor.author	Fonseca Oliveira, Maiolino Thomaz	es
dc.contributor.author	Moura, Camila	es
dc.contributor.author	Zanetta Barbosa, Darceny	es
dc.contributor.author	Coelho, Paulo G.	es
dc.date.accessioned	2015-09-21T08:40:58Z
dc.date.available	2015-09-21T08:40:58Z
dc.date.issued	2015	es
dc.identifier.citation	Baires Campos, Felipe Eduardo ; Jimbo, Ryo ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Fonseca Oliveira, Maiolino Thomaz ; Moura, Camila ; Zanetta Barbosa, Darceny ; Coelho, Paulo G.. Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2015, Vol. 20, No. 4: 12-	es
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/47156
dc.description.abstract	Background: This study histologically evaluated two implant designs: a classic thread design versus another specifically designed for healing chamber formation placed with two drilling protocols. Material and Methods: Forty dental implants (4.1 mm diameter) with two different macrogeometries were inserted in the tibia of 10 Beagle dogs, and maximum insertion torque was recorded. Drilling techniques were: until 3.75 mm (regular-group); and until 4.0 mm diameter (overdrilling-group) for both implant designs. At 2 and 4 weeks, samples were retrieved and processed for histomorphometric analysis. For torque and BIC (bone-to-implant contact) and BAFO (bone area fraction occupied), a general-linear model was employed including instrumentation technique and time in vivo as independent. Results: The insertion torque recorded for each implant design and drilling group significantly decreased as a function of increasing drilling diameter for both implant designs ( p <0.001). No significant differences were de - tected between implant designs for each drilling technique ( p >0.18). A significant increase in BIC was observed from 2 to 4 weeks for both implants placed with the overdrilling technique ( p <0.03) only, but not for those placed in the 3.75 mm drilling sites ( p >0.32). Conclusions: Despite the differences between implant designs and drilling technique an intramembranous-like healing mode with newly formed woven bone prevailed	en_US
dc.subject	Odontología	es
dc.subject	Ciencias de la salud	es
dc.title	Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.identifier.url	http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/citart?info=link&codigo=5177689&orden=0	es