NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep

dc.contributor.author	Bowers, Michelle	es
dc.contributor.author	Yoo, Daniel	es
dc.contributor.author	Marin, Charles	es
dc.contributor.author	Gil, Luiz	es
dc.contributor.author	Shabaka, Nour	es
dc.contributor.author	Goldstein, Matt	es
dc.contributor.author	Janal, Malvin	es
dc.contributor.author	Tovar, Nick	es
dc.contributor.author	Hirata, Ronaldo	es
dc.contributor.author	Bonfante, Estevam A.	es
dc.contributor.author	Coelho, Paulo G.	es
dc.date.accessioned	2016-07-26T11:53:16Z
dc.date.available	2016-07-26T11:53:16Z
dc.date.issued	2016	es
dc.identifier.citation	Bowers, Michelle ; Yoo, Daniel ; Marin, Charles ; Gil, Luiz ; Shabaka, Nour ; Goldstein, Matt ; Janal, Malvin ; Tovar, Nick ; Hirata, Ronaldo ; Bonfante, Estevam A. ; Coelho, Paulo G.. Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed inglesa, 2016, : 206-	es
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/54743
dc.description.abstract	Background: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric and histological bone response to laser-sintered implants followed by resorbable-blasting media (RBM) process relative to standard machined/RBM surface treated implants. Material and Methods: Six male sheep (n=6) received 2 Ti-6Al-4V implants (1 per surface) in each side of the mandible for 6 weeks in vivo. The histomorphometric parameters bone-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. Results: Optical interferometry revealed higher Sa and Sq values for the laser-sintered/RBM surface in relation to standard/RBM implants. No significant differences in BIC were observed between the two groups (p>0.2), but significantly higher BAFO was observed for standard/RBM implants (p<0.01). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that both surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive, and the combination of laser sintering and RBM has no advantage over the standard machined implants with subsequent RBM.	en_US
dc.relation		es
dc.subject	Odontología	es
dc.subject	Ciencias de la salud	es
dc.title	Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: a study in sheep	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES