NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Codification as Nationalization or Denationalization of Law: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Codification as Nationalization or Denationalization of Law: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Masferrer, Aniceto
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-03T08:04:13Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-03T08:04:13Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Masferrer, Aniceto 2016 Codification as Nationalization or Denationalization of Law: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective Comparative Legal History 4 2 100 130
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59300
dc.description.abstract Some scholars have presented codification as a means to both nationalise and denationalise European legal traditions. This seems to be a paradox. On the one hand, the fact that laws needed to be approved by national parliaments and the ius commune - which was somehow regarded as a foreign law - ceased to be in force, gives evidence of how much codification contributed to the nationalisation of law. On the other hand, the fact that national parliaments enacted codes whose content had been highly influenced by foreign codes reveals that codification also contributed to the denationalisation of law. Different perspectives and arguments may lead to completely opposite outcomes. This debate has been particularly present in the Spanish scholarship. In the end, it seems that the view of codification as a means of denationalisation of law has prevailed, giving either a biased and partisan view of codification, or simplifying its richness. The consequences of such an approach have been notable in describing the codification of all legal branches, particularly in the civil law domain. After the Introduction (I), the paper will explore the Spanish historiography on this matter in a European context (II.1), paying particular attention to Belgium (II.2) and Romania (II.3). I will finish with some concluding considerations (III).
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Comparative Legal History , 2016, vol. 4, num. 2, p. 100-130
dc.subject Dret comparat
dc.title Codification as Nationalization or Denationalization of Law: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.date.updated 2017-07-03T08:04:13Z
dc.identifier.idgrec 119762
dc.rights.accessRights open access es_ES

Visualització       (264.1Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques