Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Mendoza-Arnau, Amparo | es |
dc.contributor.author | Vallecillo Capilla, Manuel Francisco | es |
dc.contributor.author | Cabrerizo Vílchez, Miguel Angel | es |
dc.contributor.author | Rosales Leal, J. Ignacio | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-21T07:52:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-21T07:52:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Mendoza-Arnau, Amparo ; Vallecillo Capilla, Manuel Francisco ; Cabrerizo Vílchez, Miguel Angel ; Rosales Leal, J. Ignacio. Topographic characterisation of dental implants for commercial use. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 21 5 2016: 11- | es |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59767 | |
dc.description.abstract | To characterize the surface topography of several dental implants for commercial use. Dental implants analyzed were Certain (Biomet 3i), Tissue Level (Straumann), Interna (BTI), MG-InHex (MozoGrau), SPI (Alphabio) and Hikelt (Bioner). Surface topography was ascertained using a confocal microscope with white light. Roughness parameters obtained were: Ra, Rq, Rv, Rp, Rt, Rsk and Rku. The results were analysed using single-factor ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls(p<0.05) tests. Certain and Hikelt obtained the highest Ra and Rq scores, followed by Tissue Level. Interna and SPI obtained lower scores, and MG-InHex obtained the lowest score. Rv scores followed the same trend. Certain obtained the highest Rp score, followed by SPI and Hikelt, then Interna and Tissue Level. MG-InHex obtained the lowest scores. Certain obtained the highest Rt score, followed by Interna and Hikelt, then SPI and Tissue Level. The lowest scores were for MG-InHex. Rsk was negative (punctured surface) in the MG-InHex, SPI and Tissue Level systems, and positive (pointed surface) in the other systems. Rku was higher than 3 (Leptokurtic) in Tissue Level, Interna, MG-InHex and SPI, and lower than 3 (Platykurtic) in Certain and Hikelt. The type of implant determines surface topography, and there are differences in the roughness parameters of the various makes of implants for clinical use. | es |
dc.title | Topographic characterisation of dental implants for commercial use | es |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4317/medoral.20333 | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |