NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Oral rehabilitation with tilted dental implants : a metaanalysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Oral rehabilitation with tilted dental implants : a metaanalysis

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Candel Martí, Eugenia es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-24T12:12:43Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-24T12:12:43Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Candel Martí, Eugenia ; Peñarrocha Diago, María. Oral rehabilitation with tilted dental implants : a metaanalysis. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 4 2012: 25- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59920
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare the course of patients treated with tilted implants versus those treated conventionally with axial implants, analyzing the success rate and marginal bone loss. Material and M ethods: A PubMed search was made using the key words ?tilted implants?, ?angled implants?, ?angulated implants?, ?inclined implants? and ?maxillary atrophy.? A review was made of the articles published between 1999-2010. The inclusion criteria were the use of tilted implants, clinical series involving at least 10 patients, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months after prosthetic loading. The exclusion criteria were isolated clinical cases, studies with missing data, and publications in languages other than English or Spanish. The metaanalysis finally included 13 articles: 7 retrospective studies and 6 prospective studies. Results: On analyzing the success rate in the retrospective studies, two reported a higher success rate with tilted implants; one a higher success rate with axial implants; and two reported similar success rates with both implants. On analyzing the success rate in the prospective studies, two reported a higher success rate with tilted implants; two a higher success rate with axial implants; and two reported similar success rates with both implants. On examining marginal bone loss, three studies reported greater bone loss with axial implants and one with tilted implants. Conclusions: There was no evidence of differences in success rate between tilted and axial implants in either the prospective or retrospective studies subjected to review. The marginal bone loss observed with the tilted and axial implants likewise proved very similar. It thus can be deduced that tilted implants exhibit the same evolutive behavior as axial implants. es
dc.title Oral rehabilitation with tilted dental implants : a metaanalysis es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.17674 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (437.3Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques