NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier es
dc.contributor.author Oltra Moscardó, María José es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-25T10:17:38Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-25T10:17:38Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier ; Oltra Moscardó, María José ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 3 2012: 22- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59957
dc.description.abstract Objective: To analyze the side effects and complications following intraosseous anesthesia (IA), comparing them with those of the conventional oral anesthesia techniques. Material and method: A simple-blind, prospective clinical study was carried out. Each patient underwent two anesthetic techniques: conventional (local infiltration and locoregional anesthetic block) and intraosseous, for respective dental operations. In order to allow comparison of IA versus conventional anesthesia, the two operations were similar and affected the same two teeth in opposite quadrants. Heart rate was recorded in all cases before injection of the anesthetic solution and again 30 seconds after injection. The complications observed after anesthetic administration were recorded. Results: A total of 200 oral anesthetic procedures were carried out in 100 patients. Both IA and conventional anesthesia resulted in a significant increase in heart rate, though the increase was greater with the latter technique. Incidents were infrequent with either anesthetic technique, with no significant differences between them. Regarding the complications, there were significant differences in pain at the injection site, with more intense pain in the case of IA (x2=3.532, p=0.030, ?2=0.02), while the limitation of oral aperture was more pronounced with conventional anesthesia (x2=5.128, p<0.05, ?2=0.014). Post-anesthetic biting showed no significant differences (x2=4.082, p=0.121, ?2=0.009). Conclusions: Both anesthetic techniques significantly increased heart rate, and IA caused comparatively more pain at the injection site, while limited oral aperture was more frequent with conventional anesthesia. Post-anesthetic biting showed no significant differences between the two techniques. es
dc.title Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.17512 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (328.1Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques