NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier es
dc.contributor.author Oltra Moscardó, María José es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-25T12:11:21Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-25T12:11:21Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Ata-Ali Mahmud, Francisco Javier ; Oltra Moscardó, María José ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 2 2012: 21- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59980
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare intraosseous anesthesia (IA) with the conventional oral anesthesia techniques. Materials and methods: A simple-blind, prospective clinical study was carried out. Each patient underwent two anesthetic techniques: conventional (local infiltration and locoregional anesthetic block) and intraosseous, for res-pective dental operations. In order to allow comparison of IA versus conventional anesthesia, the two operations were similar and affected the same two teeth in opposite quadrants. Results: A total of 200 oral anesthetic procedures were carried out in 100 patients. The mean patient age was 28.6±9.92 years. Fifty-five vestibular infiltrations and 45 mandibular blocks were performed. All patients were also subjected to IA. The type of intervention (conservative or endodontic) exerted no significant influence (p=0.58 and p=0.62, respectively). The latency period was 8.52±2.44 minutes for the conventional techniques and 0.89±0.73 minutes for IA - the difference being statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding patient anesthesia sensation, the infiltrative techniques lasted a maximum of one hour, the inferior alveolar nerve blocks lasted between 1-3 hours, and IA lasted only 2.5 minutes - the differences being statistically significant (p?0.0000, ?=0.29). Anesthetic success was recorded in 89% of the conventional procedures and in 78% of the IA. Most patients preferred IA (61%) (p=0.0032). Conclusions: The two anesthetic procedures have been compared for latency, duration of anesthetic effect, anesthetic success rate and patient preference. Intraosseous anesthesia has been shown to be a technique to be taken into account when planning conservative and endodontic treatments. © Medicina Oral S. L. es
dc.title Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.17456 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (315.6Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques