NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. : a comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. : a comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Martínez Rodríguez, Natalia es
dc.contributor.author Barona Dorado, Cristina es
dc.contributor.author Martín Ares, María es
dc.contributor.author Cortés-Bretón Brinkman, Jorge es
dc.contributor.author Martínez González, José María es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-25T12:11:22Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-25T12:11:22Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es
dc.identifier.citation Martínez Rodríguez, Natalia ; Barona Dorado, Cristina ; Martín Ares, María ; Cortés-Bretón Brinkman, Jorge ; Martínez González, José María. Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. : a comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 17 2 2012: 5- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/59986
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To evaluate the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of articaine versus lidocaine at equal vasoconstrictor concentration. Study Design: A total of 96 male and female patients who underwent surgical treatment of the lower third molar participated. Patients were randomly assigned to articaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000 and lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000. The variables analysed were latency period, duration of anaesthetic effect, tolerance and adverse reactions. Results: Both the latency period and the duration of anaesthetic effect were greater for articaine, although the differences were not statistically significant. Latency: mean difference of 2.70 ± 2.12 minutes (95%CI of -1.51 minutes - 6.92 minutes). Duration: mean difference of -33 minutes 5 seconds ± 31 minutes (95% CI -1 hour 35 minutes - 29 minutes). There were 4 adverse events that did not require the patients to be withdrawn from the study. Conclusions: The anaesthetics in this study have very similar properties for use in surgery and have demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile. © Medicina Oral. es
dc.title Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. : a comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.17414 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (376.7Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques