NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Montero Martín, Javier es
dc.contributor.author López, Joaquín Francisco es
dc.contributor.author Vicente Galindo, Purificación es
dc.contributor.author Galindo Villardón, María Purificación es
dc.contributor.author Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto es
dc.contributor.author Bravo Pérez, Manuel es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-26T10:35:16Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-26T10:35:16Z
dc.date.issued 2011 es
dc.identifier.citation Montero Martín, Javier ; López, Joaquín Francisco ; Vicente Galindo, Purificación ; Galindo Villardón, María Purificación ; Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto ; Bravo Pérez, Manuel. Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 16 6 2011: 23- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60082
dc.description.abstract Objectives: We aimed to compare the utility and validity of two popular socio-dental indicators (OIDP and OHIP- 14) for describing the impact of oral conditions on quality of life applied simultaneously. Study design: We recruited a consecutive sample of 270 healthy Spanish workers visiting the Employment Risk Prevention Centre for a routine medical check-up. OHIP-14 was self-completed before the oral examination and the face to face interview of the OIDP was performed. Both instruments were compared by evaluating its reliability and its validity. Results and Conclusions: The standardised Cronbach alphas for OHIP-14 and OIDP were 0.89 and 0.74 respectively. OIDP showed lower face validity but higher content validity than OHIP-14. Both indicators showed high construct and criterion validity, since individuals perceiving need for dental treatment or having any complaint about their mouth obtained significantly higher total OIDP and OHIP scores than their counterparts. The prevalence of impacts was much higher using the OHIP (80.7%) than the OIDP (27.8%). © Medicina Oral S. L. es
dc.title Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.16851 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (383.5Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques