NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Prevalence of impacted premolars in a Turkish population and considerations for surgical treatment

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Prevalence of impacted premolars in a Turkish population and considerations for surgical treatment

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Kaya, Göksel ?im?ek es
dc.contributor.author Omezli, M. Melih es
dc.contributor.author Yapici, Günay es
dc.contributor.author Dayi, Ertunç es
dc.contributor.author Ertas, Ümit es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-26T10:35:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-26T10:35:17Z
dc.date.issued 2011 es
dc.identifier.citation Kaya, Göksel ?im?ek ; Omezli, M. Melih ; Yapici, Günay ; Dayi, Ertunç ; Ertas, Ümit. Prevalence of impacted premolars in a Turkish population and considerations for surgical treatment. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 16 6 2011: 17- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60083
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence, associated pathology and symptoms, and treatment of impacted premolars in a Turkish population. Study Design: This retrospective study examined panoramic radiographs and clinical records of 9,000 patients who presented consecutively at our oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics between January 1998 and January 2009. In addition to demographic data (patient sex and age), data was compiled on the number and location of impacted missing maxillary and mandibular premolars, retained deciduous molars, associated pathologies and symptoms, and treatment methods. Results: A total of 105 impacted maxillary or mandibular premolars were observed in 93 patients (1.03%). Of these, 48 (51.6%) were female (age range: 13-57 years) and 45 (43.4%) were male (age range: 13-58 years). Impacted mandibular second premolars accounted for 55.2% (n=58) of all impacted premolars. Migration was observed in only 11.83% of patients (n=11). Pathological changes and symptoms were noted in 15.05% of patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the prophylactic extraction of non-migrated impacted premolars may not be necessary. If the patient is cooperative, a "wait and see" approach may be preferable. Orthodontic or prosthetic treatment options should also be considered when planning treatment of non-migrated impacted premolars. Migrated impacted premolars should be kept under observation and should only be removed if they are associated with pathology or if extraction is required for prosthetic or orthodontic treatment. © Medicina Oral S. L. es
dc.title Prevalence of impacted premolars in a Turkish population and considerations for surgical treatment es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.17027 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (988.3Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques