NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow versus Ah Plus using different obturation techniques

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow versus Ah Plus using different obturation techniques

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Savariz Martins, Aline es
dc.contributor.author González Rodríguez, Mª Paloma es
dc.contributor.author Ferrer Luque, Carmen María es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-27T06:51:38Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-27T06:51:38Z
dc.date.issued 2010 es
dc.identifier.citation Savariz Martins, Aline ; González Rodríguez, Mª Paloma ; Ferrer Luque, Carmen María. Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow versus Ah Plus using different obturation techniques. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 15 6 2010: 22- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60235
dc.description.abstract Objective. To compare the long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow® using different obturation techniques. Study Design. Three hundred teeth, prepared with a crown-down technique, were divided into thirty experimental groups (n=10) to evaluate the apical and coronal leakage, at 3, 30 and 120 days, of lateral compaction gutta-percha + AH Plus?, lateral compaction gutta-percha + GuttaFlow®, single cone + AH Plus?, single cone + GuttaFlow®, and GuttaFlow® only. Results. Both coronal and apical leakage, at the three times of measurement, no significant differences were found among GuttaFlow® + lateral compaction gutta-percha and GuttaFlow® + single cone groups, whereas the only GuttaFlow® reached the highest leakage values at 30 and 120 days. AH Plus?, using both techniques, showed high levels of leakage after 120 days to the coronal leakage and after 30 days to the apical leakage when compared silicon based sealer. Conclusion. GuttaFlow®, using with lateral compaction and single cone techniques, shows a greater apical and coronal sealing ability than AH Plus? over time. GuttaFlow® when used as only creates a poorer sealing than when used with lateral compaction gutta-percha or single cone techniques. es
dc.title Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow versus Ah Plus using different obturation techniques es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.15.e936 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (413.2Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques