NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Vicente Hernández, Ascensión es
dc.contributor.author Toledano Pérez, Manuel es
dc.contributor.author Bravo González, Luis Alberto es
dc.contributor.author Romeo, Alejandro es
dc.contributor.author de la Higuera, Blanca es
dc.contributor.author Osorio Ruiz, R. es
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-27T06:54:41Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-27T06:54:41Z
dc.date.issued 2010 es
dc.identifier.citation Vicente Hernández, Ascensión ; Toledano Pérez, Manuel ; Bravo González, Luis Alberto ; Romeo, Alejandro ; de la Higuera, Blanca ; Osorio Ruiz, R.. Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 15 5 2010: 29- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60271
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength and site of failure of brackets bonded to dry and wet enamel. Study design: 50 teeth were divided into ten groups of 5 teeth each (10 surfaces). In half the groups enamel was kept dry before bonding, and in the other half distilled water was applied to wet the surface after etching. The following groups were established: 1)Acid/Transbond-XT (dry/wet) XT; 2) Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP)/Transbond-XT paste (dry/wet); 3) Concise (dry), Transbond MIP/Concise (wet), 4) FujiOrtho-LC (dry/ wet); 5) SmartBond (dry/wet). Brackets were bonded to both buccal and lingual surfaces. Specimens were stored in distilled water (24 hours at 37ºC) and thermocycled. Brackets were debonded using a Universal testing machine (cross-head speed 1 mm/min). Failure sites were classified using a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences in bond strength were detected between the adhesives under wet and dry conditions except for SmartBond, whose bond strength was significantly lower under dry conditions. For all the adhesives most bond failures were of mixed site location except for Smartbond, which failed at the adhesive-bracket interface. Conclusions: Under wet conditions the bonding capacity of the adhesives tested was similar than under dry conditions, with the exception of SmartBond which improved under wet conditions. es
dc.title Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.15.e820 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (338.6Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques