NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Science ant technology, governance and public acceptance

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Science ant technology, governance and public acceptance

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Todt, Oliver
dc.contributor.author Luján, José Luis
dc.contributor.author Moreno-Castro, Carolina
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-01T10:39:20Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-01T10:39:20Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es_ES
dc.identifier.citation Todt, Oliver; Luján, José Luis y Moreno, Carolina (2012). "Science and technology governance and public acceptance", en Bucchi, Massimiano y Trench, Brian (Eds.): Quality, Honesty and Beauty in Science and Technology Communication: PCST 2012 : Book of Papers. Vicenza: Observa Science in Society. Págs. 175-178 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/60490
dc.description.abstract A relevant part of the current debates about public acceptance of science and technology centers on the social acceptability of science and technology governance (including decision making, regulation and risk management). In this presentation we will argue, based on survey data, that the relationship between public and stakeholder acceptance of governance, on the one hand, and the level of public education, on the other, as well as current improvements in science and technology management is still unclear. We present recent survey data from Spain on the public perception of science and technology governance, particularly on the perception of the importance of scientific knowledge and values in governance, precautionary regulation, as well as the role of experts in decision making. The survey’s data are particularly relevant due to the relatively limited availability of data on public attitudes towards regulation and decision making (instead of particular scientific-technological applications themselves). The analysis also takes account of other recent data related to public participation and information in science and technology governance. The results indicate that neither the introduction of participatory decision making, nor increased scientific- technological education and fostering of scientific culture, nor the adoption of new regulatory frames (like the precautionary principle) are likely to significantly improve social acceptance of science and technology governance. Such reforms may transform the focus of public debates on policy and governance, but do not necessarily lead to closure. In consequence, more research is needed on the complex relationship between information, participation, trust and acceptance, as well as their respective roles in decision making and regulation of science and technology es_ES
dc.language.iso en es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries Quality, honesty and beauty in Science and Technology Communication;
dc.subject Política científica es_ES
dc.subject Scientiic Policy es_ES
dc.subject Science communication es_ES
dc.title Science ant technology, governance and public acceptance es_ES
dc.type book part es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIA POLÍTICA::Ciencias políticas ::Política científica y tecnológica es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::SOCIOLOGÍA es_ES

Visualització       (238.3Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques