Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Boix Palop, Andrés | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-08T08:32:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-08T08:32:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Boix Palop, Andrés 2017 The Catalunya Conundrum, Part 3 : Protecting the Constitution by Violating the Constitution Verfassungsblog | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10550/62977 | |
dc.description.abstract | Article 155 CE, if activated, would have offered to the Spanish government a legal tool to take control of Catalan institutions on the terms decided by the Senate after a public debate. Article 116 CE, if activated after a debate in Congress in a situation of violence that could create a risk for public services or a sufficiently serious threat to public order, is to be used in order to limit fundamental rights, invoking a state of emergency. Lacking legitimacy in Catalonia because of the absence of solutions to Catalan democratic claims within the Spanish legal framework, the position of Spanish institutions is badly weakened. Therefore, they do not to want to take the risk of creating even more political unrest in Catalonia with public and explicit debates on the suspension of autonomy or on the necessity of limiting fundamental rights. Instead, Spanish government is pushing other institutions, such as the Constitutional Court, prosecutors, police and judges, as well as their own executive powers, beyond their ordinary limits. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Verfassungsblog, 2017 | |
dc.subject | Independència | |
dc.subject | Comunitats autònomes | |
dc.subject | Referèndum | |
dc.title | The Catalunya Conundrum, Part 3 : Protecting the Constitution by Violating the Constitution | |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2017-11-08T08:32:59Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17176/20170927-103005 | |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 120722 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |