NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Pellicer Chover, Hilario es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Aloy Prósper, Amparo es
dc.contributor.author Sanchis González, José Carlos es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel es
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-02T12:04:11Z
dc.date.issued 2017 es
dc.identifier.citation Pellicer Chover, Hilario ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Aloy Prósper, Amparo ; Sanchis González, José Carlos ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 22 6 2017: 12- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/65942
dc.description.abstract To compare the technique of high speed drilling with irrigation and low speed drilling without irrigation in order to evaluate the success rate and peri-implant bone loss at 12 months of follow-up. A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out in patients requiring dental implants to rehabilitate their unitary edentulism. Patients were recruited from the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Valencia (Spain) between September 2014 and August 2015. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to two groups: group A (high-speed drilling with irrigation) and group B (low-speed drilling without irrigation). The success rate and peri-implant bone loss were recorded at 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-five patients (9 men and 16 women) with 30 implants were enrolled in the study: 15 implants in group A and 15 implants in group B. The mean bone loss of the implants in group A and group B was 0.83 ± 0.73 mm and 0.62 ± 0.70 mm, respectively (p > 0.05). In the maxilla, the bone loss was 1.04 ± 0.63 mm in group A and 0.71 ± 0.36 mm in group B (p > 0.05), while bone loss in the mandible was 0.59 ± 0.80 mm in group A and 0.69 ± 0.77 mm in group B (p > 0.05). The implant success rate at 12 months was 93.3% in group A and 100% in group B. Within the limitations of the study, the low-speed drilling technique presented peri-implant bone loss outcomes similar to those of the conventional drilling technique at 12 months of follow-up. es
dc.title Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.21694 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (1.172Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques