NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Mandibular advancement devices vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Mandibular advancement devices vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Cammaroto, Giovanni es
dc.contributor.author Galletti, Cosimo es
dc.contributor.author Galletti, Francesco es
dc.contributor.author Galletti, Bruno es
dc.contributor.author Galletti, Claudio es
dc.contributor.author Gay Escoda, Cosme es
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-22T10:22:57Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-22T10:22:57Z
dc.date.issued 2017 es
dc.identifier.citation Cammaroto, Giovanni ; Galletti, Cosimo ; Galletti, Francesco ; Galletti, Bruno ; Galletti, Claudio ; Gay Escoda, Cosme. Mandibular advancement devices vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Systematic review and meta-analysis. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 22 4 2017: 16- es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/66240
dc.description.abstract Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder that may affect at least 2 to 4% of the adult population. Nasal-Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (N-CPAP) is today considered the gold standard for the treatment of OSA. The development of oral appliances (OAs) represents a new approach for the management of this pathology. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy of OAs and N-CPAP in the treatment of patients with mild to severe OSA. A PubMed-MEDLINE and Cochrane databases search of articles published between 1982 and 2016 comparing the effect of N-CPAP and OAs in OSA patients was conducted during July 2016. The studies were selected and stratified according to PRISMA and SORT criteria. The main outcome measure was post-treatment Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) while secondary outcomes included post-treatment Epworth Score Scale (ESS) score and lowest Oxygen Saturation level. N-CPAP was significantly more effective in suppressing AHI than OA. Moreover, N- CPAP was significantly more effective in increasing post-treatment lowest Oxygen Saturation level than OA. However, no significant different in decreasing ESS values was found between the two treatments. On the basis of evidence in this review it would appear appropriate to offer OA therapy to those who are unwilling or unable to persist with CPAP therapy. N-CPAP still must be considered the gold standard treatment for OSA and, therefore, OAs may be included in the list of alternative options. es
dc.title Mandibular advancement devices vs nasal-continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Systematic review and meta-analysis es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.21671 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (1.250Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques