NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO
How to be a critical but reasonable debater: Suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups
Repositori DSpace/Manakin
- Inici
- Investigació
- e-prints
- 72 - Filosofia
- Visualitza element
IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/
How to be a critical but reasonable debater: Suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups
Mostra el registre complet de l'element
|
Visualització
|
| Alcolea Banegas, Jesús | |||
| Aquest document és un/a article, creat/da en: 2018 | |||
|
|||
| Discourse about pseudoscience usually accompanies dialogue about science. Despite attempts to separate the two domains, people still rely on pseudoscientific remedies. The ease with which beliefs become contagious, the popularity of certain products, and the verbiage of their sellers often leave us in the hands of so-called experts. Although the scientific method can help us to prove the ineffectiveness of certain remedies, we do not always have conclusive arguments to dispel doubts, and so we are left at the mercy of supposed technical knowledge or false scientific rigour. Faced with this, we must resort to critical thinking to respond to alleged experts and conduct ourselves reasonably. | |||
| Veure al catàleg Trobes | |||
Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)
-
72 - Filosofia [1085]