NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Bahari, Mahmood es
dc.contributor.author Savadi Oskoee, Siavash es
dc.contributor.author Kimyai, Soodabeh es
dc.contributor.author Savadi-Oskoee, Ayda es
dc.contributor.author Abbasi, Farhang es
dc.date.accessioned 2018-11-28T12:33:41Z
dc.date.available 2018-11-28T12:33:41Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es
dc.identifier.citation Bahari, Mahmood ; Savadi Oskoee, Siavash ; Kimyai, Soodabeh ; Savadi-Oskoee, Ayda ; Abbasi, Farhang. Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10 8 2018: 732-738 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/68107
dc.description.abstract Considering the differences in the filler particles between giomer and conventional composite resins and the importance of these fillers in the repair bond strength, the aim was to evaluate the effects of different etching strategies with phosphoric acid (PA) and hydrofluoric acid (HF) on the microtensile repair bond strength (µTRBS) of giomer. Ten giomer blocks were randomly assigned into 10: 1) control; 2) 37%PA-20s; 3) 3%HF-20s; 4) 3%HF-120s; 5) 9.6%HF-20s; 6) 9.6%HF-120s; 7) 37%PA-20s + 3%HF-120s; 8) 37%PA-20s + 9.6%HF-120s; 9) 3%HF-120s + 37%PA-20s; 10) 9.6%HF-120s + 37%PA-20s. In all groups, the One-Step Plus bonding system was applied and the new giomer block was bonded to the existing giomer. After cross-sectional cutting, 18 samples were prepared from each block and the µTRBS of the samples was measured at a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (P<0.05). The µTRBS in groups 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 were significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The µTRBS in group 2 was even less than that in the control group (P<0.001). The highest µTRBS was recorded in group 10, which was significantly different from those in groups 3, 4 and 9 (P<0.05). In addition, the differences between group 9 and groups 6, 7 and 8 were significantly different (P<0.05). Etching with PA resulted in a decrease in µTRBS. Etching with HF, except for 3%HF-20s and HF after etching with PA, resulted in a significant increase in giomer`s µTRBS. An increase in the application time of 3%HF resulted in a significant increase in the µTRBS. es
dc.title Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/jced.54436 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (1.857Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques