NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Imperativos, normas y verdad | Imperatives, norms and truth.

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

dc.contributor.author	Ibáñez Macías, Antonio	es
dc.date.accessioned	2019-01-29T11:11:45Z
dc.date.available	2019-01-29T11:11:45Z
dc.date.issued	2019	es
dc.identifier.citation	Ibáñez Macías, Antonio. Imperativos, normas y verdad \| Imperatives, norms and truth.. En: Cuadernos electrónicos de filosofía del derecho, 38 2019: 13-	es
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10550/68780
dc.description.abstract	Before embarking on the logical analysis of constitutional legal norms or norms in general, it is necessary to try to resolve a previous question that affects the possibility of the existence of a logic of norms: the Jørgensen?s dilemma.Our proposed solution to this dilemma is as follows: norms are performative utterances. At the same time, performative utterances are statements that have truth value. In addition, the legal norms are statements of type ?A says p?, which explains that there may be true norms and, at the same time, contradictory to each other.	es
dc.title	Imperativos, normas y verdad \| Imperatives, norms and truth.	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.7203/CEFD.38.12689	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES