NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.contributor.author Palau, Ivan es
dc.contributor.author Cabanes Gumbau, Guillermo es
dc.contributor.author Tarazona Álvarez, Beatriz es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-11T08:31:58Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-11T08:31:58Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es
dc.identifier.citation Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Palau, Ivan ; Cabanes Gumbau, Guillermo ; Tarazona Álvarez, Beatriz ; Peñarrocha Diago, María. Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss. En: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10 12 2018: 1216-1222 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10550/69476
dc.description.abstract The measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss is currently carried out using digital methods of radiographic analysis assisted by various types of software. The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of three different softwares: specific radiology software for the development and visualization of radiological images in DICOM format (3Dicom Viewer®), advanced level software for professional editing of bitmap images (or raster graphics) (Adobe Photoshop®), and mid-level software for processing bitmap-type images, programmed in Java and in the public domain (ImageJ®). It was verified that the three softwares used are valid for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss provided that the appropriate protocol is fulfilled. The results showed no significant differences between Adobe Photoshop® and ImageJ® with respect to 3Dicom Viewer® in the measurements of mesial and distal bone loss of the implants, without influence of the dental sector where they were located. The measurements made with ImageJ® looked more like those of the control software (3Dicom Viewer®) than those of Adobe Photoshop®, but with a greater degree of dispersion. Thus, Adobe Photoshop® is a slightly inaccurate method but with less dispersion. es
dc.title Comparison of digital protocols for the measurement of peri-implant marginal bone loss es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/jced.55396 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (650.0Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques