Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Soto Penaloza, David | es |
dc.contributor.author | Caneva, Marco | es |
dc.contributor.author | Viña Almunia, José | es |
dc.contributor.author | Martín de Llano, José Javier | es |
dc.contributor.author | García Mira, Berta | es |
dc.contributor.author | Peñarrocha Oltra, David | es |
dc.contributor.author | Botticelli, Daniele | es |
dc.contributor.author | Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-06T12:47:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-06T12:47:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Soto Penaloza, David ; Caneva, Marco ; Viña Almunia, José ; Martín de Llano, José Javier ; García Mira, Berta ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David ; Botticelli, Daniele ; Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel. Effect on osseointegration of two implant macro-designs : a histomorphometric analysis of bicortically installed implants in different topographic sites of rabbit?s tibiae. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 24 4 2019: 4- | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10550/72044 | |
dc.description.abstract | To evaluate the effect of two different implant macro-designs on the sequential osseointegration at bicortically installed implants in the rabbit tibia. A further aim is to compare the osseointegration at different topographic zones. 27 New Zealand rabbits were implemented. Two implants, one for each macro-design (Ticare Inhex® or Ticare Quattro®, Mozo-Grau, Valladolid, Spain), were randomly implanted in the diaphysis or metaphysis of each tibia. The flaps were sutured to allow a submerged healing. The animals were sacrificed after 2, 4 or 8 weeks. Ground sections were prepared and analyzed. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for newly formed bone in contact with the implant surface, being about 16%, 19% and 33% in both groups, after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of healing. Bone apposition was slightly higher in the diaphysis, reaching values of 36.4% in the diaphysis, and 29.3% in the metaphysis at 8 weeks of healing. It was observed that the implant position showed a statistical significance regarding BIC values at 4 and 8 weeks (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis fails to detect statistical significant differences for the interaction between implant designs and topographic site. Ticare Quattro® design had a slight better BIC values at diaphysis sites across healing stages, but without reaching a statistical significance. The both implant macro-designs provided similar degrees of osseointegration. Bone morphometry and density may affect bone apposition onto the implant surface. The apposition rates were slightly better in diaphysis compared to metaphysis. | es |
dc.title | Effect on osseointegration of two implant macro-designs : a histomorphometric analysis of bicortically installed implants in different topographic sites of rabbit?s tibiae | es |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4317/medoral.22825 | es |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |