NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites : systematic review and meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites : systematic review and meta-analysis

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa es
dc.contributor.author Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo es
dc.contributor.author Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó es
dc.contributor.author de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando es
dc.contributor.author Camello de Lima, Fernando-José es
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-06T12:51:18Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-06T12:51:18Z
dc.date.issued 2019 es
dc.identifier.citation de Oliveira-Neto, Olavo-Barbosa ; Lemos, Cleidiel-Aparecido-Araújo ; Barbosa, Fabiano-Timbó ; de Sousa-Rodrigues, Célio-Fernando ; Camello de Lima, Fernando-José. Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites : systematic review and meta-analysis. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 24 4 2019: 18- es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/72058
dc.description.abstract Alveolar infection is known as a risk factor for implant failure. Current meta-analysis on the theme could not prove statistically that immediate dental implants placed into infected sites have a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dental implants placed into infected versus non-infected sites. Seven databases were sought by two reviewers. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that compared the placement of dental implants into infected versus non-infected sites were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria were: papers in which the survival rate was not the primary outcome; papers without a control group; studies with less than one year of follow-up; studies whose patients did not receive antibiotic therapy; studies with medically compromised patients; duplicated papers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Of the 3.253 initial hits, 8 studies were included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis (kappa=0.90; very good agreement). Forest plot for implant failure showed that immediate implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant risk of failure that is almost 3 times higher than when placed into non-infected sites (risk ratio= 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 8.56; p= 0.04; 935 implants; i2= 0%). Peri-implant outcomes showed no statistical difference. Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites presented a statistically significant higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites. Peri-implant outcomes were not statistically affected in this intervention. es
dc.title Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites : systematic review and meta-analysis es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.22954 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (1.907Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques