NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Pellicer Chover, Hilario es
dc.contributor.author Diaz Sanchez, Rosa Maria es
dc.contributor.author Soto Penaloza, David es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Diago, María es
dc.contributor.author Canullo, Luigi es
dc.contributor.author Peñarrocha Oltra, David es
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-06T12:51:49Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-06T12:51:49Z
dc.date.issued 2019 es
dc.identifier.citation Pellicer Chover, Hilario ; Diaz Sanchez, Rosa Maria ; Soto Penaloza, David ; Peñarrocha Diago, María ; Canullo, Luigi ; Peñarrocha Oltra, David. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 24 5 2019: 2- es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/72060
dc.description.abstract To systematically assess studies analyzing peri-implant bone loss in implants placed in crestal and subcrestal position. Following the recommended methods for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), an electronic search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and LILACS databases to identify all relevant articles published up until April 2017. The search included human studies comparing marginal bone loss (MBL) between a control group and a study group with a minimum of 10 patients and a minimum follow-up of 6 months after prosthetic loading with rough neck implants. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias in the selected studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Collaboration for clinical trials. Of 342 potentially eligible items, 7 complied with the inclusion criteria. One article was retrieved through the manual search. Eight articles were finally included: five experimental and three observational studies. The risk of bias assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration and Newcastle-Ottawa showed a high risk of bias. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range 6-36 months). In four studies, implants placed in a crestal position presented higher MBL than subcrestal implants - the differences being significant in one study, while in three studies, implants placed in a subcrestal position presented greater MBL than crestal implants, with significant differences in only one study. Despite its limitations, the present systematic review did not find better outcomes between crestal and subcrestal implant placement, however, new studies will be needed, involving improved designs and the standardization of protocols to allow statistical comparisons and the drawing of firm conclusions. es
dc.title Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.23006 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (2.807Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques