Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Ballester Gómez, X. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-21T12:17:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-21T12:17:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ballester Gómez, X. 2020 Scarcely classic, barely tradition, dubiously medieval and catalan by Force Quaderni di Filologia Romanza della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell'Università di Bologna 26/27 5/6 243 251 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10550/73968 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of the first problems with this publication is the very particular use of the phrase Classical Tradition, as here this concept extends up to Petrarch ( 1374) and Boccaccio ( 1375) compared to the traditional use that confines it to authors of ancient Greek and Latin literature. This means that, alongside the classics of Virgil, Livy and Ovid, the medieval Petrarch and Boccaccio are also studied as models for medieval authors Bernat Metge ( 1413) and Joan Roiç de Corella ( 1497) respectively. Since Petrarch and Metge shared space in this world for around 40 years, it is also difficult to understand the meaning that the term tradition might have in respect of these two almost contemporary authors. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Quaderni di Filologia Romanza della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell'Università di Bologna, 2020, vol. 26/27 , num. 5/6, p. 243-251 | |
dc.subject | Llatí | |
dc.title | Scarcely classic, barely tradition, dubiously medieval and catalan by Force | |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2020-04-21T12:17:01Z | |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 138004 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |