NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Aguilar-Duran, Laura es
dc.contributor.author Mir Mari, Javier es
dc.contributor.author Figueiredo, Rui es
dc.contributor.author Valmaseda Castellón, E. es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-14T10:11:38Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-14T10:11:38Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es
dc.identifier.citation Aguilar-Duran, Laura ; Mir Mari, Javier ; Figueiredo, Rui ; Valmaseda Castellón, E.. Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 25 1 2020: 12- es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77082
dc.description.abstract To determine agreement among the most commonly used methods for assessing the gingival biotype. An electronic survey was sent to a sample of dentists practicing in Spain. The questionnaire was based on the evaluation of 5 cases involving different gingival biotype assessment methods. Dentists were required to classify the cases as having a ?thin?, ?thick? or ?not able to classify? biotype. Each case was assessed using a frontal intraoral photo of the anterior teeth; an enlarged photo of the buccal aspect of the tooth with a periodontal probe inserted inside the sulcus; and the real thickness measured in mm with a calibrated needle. Agreement among the classifications was assessed using Cohen?s kappa coefficient. A total of 104 surveys were analyzed. The most commonly used assessment method was visual evaluation of the morphology of the gingiva and the teeth (62.5%). Concordance among the three different methods was weak (kappa = 0.278). Agreement among the classification methods was greater in extreme cases (thinner and thicker gingival thickness). The most commonly used methods for assessing gingival biotype are not reliable. The three tested methods show poor to weak agreement, which leads to non-reliable estimation of the gingival biotype. es
dc.title Is measurement of the gingival biotype reliable? Agreement among different assessment methods es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.23280 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (296.3Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques