NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (?8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla : a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (?8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla : a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Lozano-Carrascal, Naroa es
dc.contributor.author Anglada-Bosqued, Albert es
dc.contributor.author Salomó-Coll, Oscar es
dc.contributor.author Hernández-Alfaro, Federico es
dc.contributor.author Wang, Hom-Lay es
dc.contributor.author Gargallo Albiol, Jordi es
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-14T10:49:22Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-14T10:49:22Z
dc.date.issued 2020 es
dc.identifier.citation Lozano-Carrascal, Naroa ; Anglada-Bosqued, Albert ; Salomó-Coll, Oscar ; Hernández-Alfaro, Federico ; Wang, Hom-Lay ; Gargallo Albiol, Jordi. Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (?8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla : a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans. En: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa, 25 2 2020: 12- es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77107
dc.description.abstract One of the greatest challenges that dentists face today is to rehabilitate severe atrophied alveolar ridges in partially and completely edentulous patients with implants. Despite the high survival rate of implants placed next to sinus elevation, this technique presents complications that can be avoided by placing short implants, an option that also presents high survival rates. For this reason, the aim of this study is to compare the survival rate, marginal bone loss and complications associated with short implants (<8 mm) versus longer implants (?8mm) placed with lateral sinus floor elevation in posterior atrophic maxillae. A literature search was conducted by two independent reviewers in the PubMed/Medline (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC) electronic database for articles published from January 2007 to July 2018. Seven qualified articles were selected for the meta-analysis. The test for overall effect did not find statistical significance in the survival rates, overall complications, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications and prosthetic complications. However, the test showed statistically significant differences in biological complications in favor of standard implants, and marginal bone loss between control and test groups in favor of short implants (<8mm) was found. Within the limitations of the present study, prosthetic rehabilitations with short implants (<8mm) in posterior maxilla is a reliable treatment option as an alternative to lateral wall sinus floor augmentation. es
dc.title Short implants (<8mm) versus longer implants (?8mm) with lateral sinus floor augmentation in posterior atrophic maxilla : a meta-analysis of RCT`s in humans es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.23248 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES

Visualització       (2.070Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques