Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Stedman Bernal, Michael | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-05T12:00:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-05T12:00:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Stedman Bernal, Michael. Análisis de la excepción de la empresa en crisis (Failing firm defence): la supervivencia de la empresa en el Derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea. En: Revista Boliviana de Derecho, 29 2020: 288-313 | es |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10550/77615 | |
dc.description.abstract | The failing firm defence is a controversial practice because, although it provides economic and social benefits, it carries a high risk of creating monopolies and situations where the dominant position is abused. Critics focus on the stringent requirements and the heavy burden of proof because they increase the risk of companies taking more dangerous alternatives to remain in the market and, as they point out, in some cases, the result has been that the authorities have deviated from the strict application of the failing firm defence. The solution proposed by academic commentators is the counterfactual analysis, but the long-term consequences of its application for competition are uncertain, so a further study of these consequences or a development of the failing firm defence, in order to make it more accessible, is necessary. | es |
dc.title | Análisis de la excepción de la empresa en crisis (Failing firm defence): la supervivencia de la empresa en el Derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea | es |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.subject.unesco | UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS | es |
dc.identifier.doi | es | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |