Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Gadea Domenech, Marien | |
dc.contributor.author | Aliño, Marta | |
dc.contributor.author | Hidalgo, Vanesa | |
dc.contributor.author | Espert Tortajada, Raúl | |
dc.contributor.author | Salvador Fernández-Montejo, Alicia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-28T12:25:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-28T12:25:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gadea Domenech, Marien Aliño, Marta Hidalgo, Vanesa Espert Tortajada, Raúl Salvador Fernández-Montejo, Alicia 2020 Effects of a single session of SMR neurofeedback training on anxiety and cortisol levels. Neurophysiologie Clinique-Clinical Neurophysiology 50 3 167 173 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79480 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives. According to some studies, a putatively calming effect of EEG neurofeedback training could be useful as a therapeutic tool in psychiatric practice. With the aim of elucidating this possibility, we tested the efficacy of a single session of ↑sensorimotor (SMR)/↓theta neurofeedback training for mood improvement in 32 healthy men, taking into account trainability, independence and interpretability of the results. Methods. A pre-post design, with the following dependent variables, was applied: (i) psychometric measures of mood with regards to anxiety, depression, and anger (Profile of Mood State, POMS, and State Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI); (ii) biological measures (salivary levels of cortisol); (iii) neurophysiological measures (EEG frequency band power analysis). In accordance with general recommendations for research in neurofeedback, a control group receiving sham neurofeedback was included. Results. Anxiety levels decreased after the real neurofeedback and increased after the sham neurofeedback (P < 0.01, size effect 0.9 for comparison between groups). Cortisol decreased after the experiment in both groups, though with significantly more pronounced effects in the desired direction after the real neurofeedback (P < 0.04; size effect 0.7). The group receiving real neurofeedback significantly enhanced their SMR band (P < 0.004; size effect 0.88), without changes in the theta band. The group receiving sham neurofeedback did not show any EEG changes. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Neurophysiologie Clinique-Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020, vol. 50, num. 3, p. 167-173 | |
dc.subject | Ansietat | |
dc.subject | Simulació, Mètodes de | |
dc.title | Effects of a single session of SMR neurofeedback training on anxiety and cortisol levels. | |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2021-05-28T12:25:48Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.03.001 | |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 143069 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |