NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

dc.contributor.author	Edis, Taner	es
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-14T11:19:46Z
dc.date.issued	2018	es
dc.identifier.citation	Edis, Taner. From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 140-147	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79674
dc.description.abstract	Both the scientific and philosophical problems with classic pseudosciences such as astrology and creationism are well known, leading to institutions that are not structured to promote cognitive advancement. A focus on institutions, however, also encourages recognition of gray areas, such as parapsychology, which combines scientifically dubious claims with institutions that are comparable to most social sciences in their structure. Furthermore, institutional approaches to pseudoscience also raise questions about some academically mainstream fields such as economics. In such cases, pseudoscientific aspects of practice are harder to identify, highlighting the need to place analyses of pseudoscience in a wider context of institutional pathologies.	es
dc.title	From creationism to economics : how far should analyses of pseudoscience extend?	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco		es
dc.identifier.doi		es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES