NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

dc.contributor.author	Alcolea Banegas, Jesús	es
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-14T11:19:47Z
dc.date.available	2021-06-14T11:19:47Z
dc.date.issued	2018	es
dc.identifier.citation	Alcolea Banegas, Jesús. How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups. En: Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, 8 2018: 196-202	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/79681
dc.description.abstract	Discourse about pseudoscience usually accompanies dialogue about science. Despite attempts to separate the two domains, people still rely on pseudoscientific remedies. The ease with which beliefs become contagious, the popularity of certain products, and the verbiage of their sellers often leave us in the hands of so-called experts. Although the scientific method can help us to prove the ineffectiveness of certain remedies, we do not always have conclusive arguments to dispel doubts, and so we are left at the mercy of supposed technical knowledge or false scientific rigour. Faced with this, we must resort to critical thinking to respond to alleged experts and conduct ourselves reasonably.	es
dc.title	How to be a critical but reasonable debater : suggestions for critically addressing pseudoscientists and other similar groups	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco		es
dc.identifier.doi		es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES