Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
dc.contributor.author | Esparza-Reig, Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Guillén Riquelme, Alejandro | |
dc.contributor.author | Martí Vilar, Manuel | |
dc.contributor.author | González Sala, Francisco | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-29T14:47:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-29T14:47:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Esparza-Reig, Javier Guillén Riquelme, Alejandro Martí Vilar, Manuel González Sala, Francisco 2021 A Reliability generalization Meta-analysis of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS). Psicothema 33 3 490 499 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10550/83544 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is one of the most widely used screening instruments for evaluating addiction to gambling. Method: The main objective of this study is to analyze whether the SOGS is a reliable instrument and what characteristics of studies on the SOGS are linked to its reported reliability. Results: A meta-analysis was carried out with 63 studies including 65 independent samples. The mean value of a was .86 (95% CI of .84-.88), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.27%). The variables that explain the most heterogeneity were the continent where the study was performed (R2 = .61), application to participants with or without clinical problems (R2 = .58), the form of administration of the questionnaire (R2 = .56), and the standard deviation in the SOGS score (R2 = .13). Conclusions: The results show that the SOGS is a reliable instrument for evaluating gambling addiction. However, the meta-analysis highlights the need to report the reliability values for each empirical study and to provide a set of recommendations for researchers and professionals who use this instrument | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psicothema, 2021, vol. 33, num. 3, p. 490-499 | |
dc.subject | Psicologia | |
dc.title | A Reliability generalization Meta-analysis of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS). | |
dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2022-07-29T14:47:58Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7334/psicothema2020.449 | |
dc.identifier.idgrec | 147987 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |