NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Cabedo Peris, Javier
dc.contributor.author Martí Vilar, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Merino Soto, César
dc.contributor.author Ortiz Morán, Mafalda
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-29T16:10:05Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-29T16:10:05Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Cabedo Peris, Javier Martí Vilar, Manuel Merino Soto, César Ortiz Morán, Mafalda 2022 Basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis Healthcare 10 1 29
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/83548
dc.description.abstract The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach's a for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I2 = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach's a was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach's a. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Healthcare, 2022, vol. 10, num. 1, p. 29
dc.subject Psicologia
dc.title Basic empathy scale: a systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.date.updated 2022-07-29T16:10:05Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/healthcare10010029
dc.identifier.idgrec 149520
dc.rights.accessRights open access es_ES

Visualització       (1.489Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques