NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Gender presence on the editorial boards of journals in the Women's Studies subject category

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Gender presence on the editorial boards of journals in the Women's Studies subject category

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Sixto Costoya, Andrea
dc.contributor.author Alonso Arroyo, Adolfo
dc.contributor.author Castelló-Cogollos, Lourdes
dc.contributor.author Aleixandre Benavent, Rafael
dc.contributor.author Valderrama Zurián, Juan Carlos
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-10T08:27:49Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-11T05:45:05Z
dc.date.issued 2022 es_ES
dc.identifier.citation Sixto-Costoya,Andrea, Alonso-Arroyo,Adolfo, Castelló-Cogollos,Lourdes. et al. Gender presence on the editorial boards of journals in the Women's Studies subject category. Womens Stud Int Forum, 93 (2022). es_ES
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/85745
dc.description.abstract In the scientific journals, being part of the editorial boards, including the journals' members and chief editors, involves holding positions of power and responsibility that affect the running of a journal. Until now, these positions have usually been held by men in most scientific disciplines. In this study, the gender composition in the editorial board members (EBMs) and editor-in-chief (ECs) of the 45 Women's Studies journals classified in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) was analyzed. The following indicators were calculated: the gender distribution of ECs and EBMs by journal, publisher, country, and quartile of the journal in the JCR; the geographical area of the members; and the gender distribution of the authors of papers grouped by journal, and geographical area. The gender distribution of the ECs was 92 % women, while that of the EBMs was 82.2 %. Regarding the articles and reviews published during 2019, a 72.4 % were signed by women. These results display an “inverted truncated pyramid”: the higher the level of decision-making positions is, the higher the percentage of women. On the other hand, the results by geographical area shows an Anglo-Saxon and European bias. es_ES
dc.language.iso en es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.subject editorial board committees es_ES
dc.subject gender study es_ES
dc.subject women's studies es_ES
dc.subject bibliometric analysis es_ES
dc.title Gender presence on the editorial boards of journals in the Women's Studies subject category es_ES
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO::SOCIOLOGÍA es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102617 es_ES
dc.accrualmethod S es_ES
dc.embargo.terms 0 days es_ES

Visualització       (940.8Kb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques