NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Measurement of Prosocial tendencies: meta-Analysis of the generalization of the reliability of the instrument

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Measurement of Prosocial tendencies: meta-Analysis of the generalization of the reliability of the instrument

dc.contributor.author	Reig Aleixandre, Natalia
dc.contributor.author	Esparza-Reig, Javier
dc.contributor.author	Martí Vilar, Manuel
dc.contributor.author	Merino Soto, César
dc.contributor.author	Livia, José
dc.date.accessioned	2023-05-15T11:28:55Z
dc.date.available	2023-05-15T11:28:55Z
dc.date.issued	2023
dc.identifier.citation	Reig Aleixandre, Natalia Esparza-Reig, Javier Martí Vilar, Manuel Merino Soto, César Livia, José 2023 Measurement of Prosocial tendencies: meta-Analysis of the generalization of the reliability of the instrument Healthcare 11 4 560
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/86605
dc.description.abstract	The Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM) and its revised version (PTM-R) are used internationally to measure prosocial behaviors in different life situations. To obtain accumulated evidence of the report and the reliability of its scores, a meta-analysis of the reliability of internal consistency was performed. The databases of Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus were reviewed and all the studies that applied it from 2002 to 2021 were selected. Results: Only 47.9% of the studies presented the index of reliability of PTM and PTM-R. The meta-analytic results of the reliability report of the subscales that the PTM and the PTM-R have in common were: Public 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80), Anonymous 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.82), Dire 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.76), and Compliant 0.71 (95% CI: 0.72-0.78). Each one of them presents high levels of heterogeneity derived from the gender of the participants (percentage of women), the continent of the population, the validation design, the incentive to participate, and the form of application. It is concluded that both versions present acceptable reliabilities to measure prosocial behavior in different groups and situations, as adolescents and young people, but their clinical use is discouraged.
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.relation.ispartof	Healthcare, 2023, vol. 11, num. 4, p. 560
dc.subject	Conducta (Psicologia)
dc.subject	Conducta (Psicologia)
dc.title	Measurement of Prosocial tendencies: meta-Analysis of the generalization of the reliability of the instrument
dc.type	journal article
dc.date.updated	2023-05-15T11:28:55Z
dc.identifier.doi	10.3390/healthcare11040560
dc.identifier.idgrec	158762
dc.rights.accessRights	open access