NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations

dc.contributor.author	González, Favián
dc.contributor.author	Pardo del Val, Manuela
dc.contributor.author	Redondo Cano, Ana
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-12T08:22:21Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-13T04:45:06Z
dc.date.issued	2022	es_ES
dc.identifier.citation	González, F., Pardo del Val, M., & Redondo Cano, A. (2022). Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations. Intangible Capital, 18(2), 145-165.	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/87854
dc.description.abstract	Purpose: This article addresses the main concerns of existing literature about resistance to change (RC) in organizations, namely the limited interpretative position regarding RC focusing mainly on negative aspects and excluding potential benefits, and the poor consensus or even understanding of RC sources in organizations. Design/methodology: To approach our goal, a systematic literature review will be carried out. The initial sample, obtained using reproducible search algorithms on Scopus and Web of Science, comprises 65 papers. After applying five inclusion/exclusion criteria supported by previous systematic reviews, the final sample consists of 30 papers. Findings: This article demonstrates the prevalence of a negative position toward RC and reveals efforts to harness the potential benefits of RC. In addition, from 126 specific RC sources extracted from the analyzed papers, it discovers and discusses 22 sub-typologies of RC sources, which are grouped into five typologies. Practical implications: The paper enables the future identification of, evaluation of, and intervention in 22 potential RC sources in organizations distinguished into five typologies. The taxonomy also enables researchers to organize and summarize study topics/subtopics regarding RC in the organizational arena. Social implications: This paper draws attention to the need to recognize the meaning and implications of three alternative positions relating to RC in organizations (positive, negative, and neutral). Originality/value: The paper provides a comprehensive taxonomy of RC sources beyond the traditional classification of individual/organizational factors.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	OmniaScience	es_ES
dc.subject	resistance to change	es_ES
dc.subject	systematic literature review	es_ES
dc.subject	taxonomy	es_ES
dc.subject	sources of resistance to change	es_ES
dc.subject	interpretative positions	es_ES
dc.title	Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIA POLÍTICA	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.3926/ic.1806	es_ES
dc.accrualmethod	S	es_ES
dc.embargo.terms	0 days	es_ES
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES