NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling:systematic review and meta-analysis

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling:systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.author	Godoy-Reina, Isabel	es
dc.contributor.author	Moreu Burgos, Gerardo	es
dc.contributor.author	González Jaranay, Maximino	es
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-16T08:36:38Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-16T08:36:38Z
dc.date.issued	2021	es
dc.identifier.citation	Godoy-Reina, I., Moreu-Burgos, G., & González-Jaranay, M. (2021). Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis. En Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal (pp. e226-e237). Medicina Oral, S.L. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24146	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88016
dc.description.abstract	The main objective of this systematic review was to compare primary and secondary implant stability between placement with piezoelectric osteotomy and conventional drilling, comparing marginal bone losses as a secondary objective. An electronic search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases, besides a manual search. A total of 153 articles were retrieved, 39 from Pubmed, 44 from Scopus, and 70 from the Cochrane Library. After removing duplicates, 112 articles (1 from the manual search) were screened, and 9 were finally selected for qualitative and statistical analyses. Piezoelectric surgery is a predictable alternative to conventional drilling for dental implant placement. Medium/long-term survival rates and marginal bone losses are similar between piezoelectric osteotomy and conventional drilling, and there is no difference in ISQ values for primary stability. However, implants placed with ultrasound showed a lower decrease in implant stability quotient (ISQ) during the osseointegration period and a higher ISQ value for secondary stability. This study contributes further information on peri-implant bone tissue at 3 and 6 months after implant placement with piezoelectric osteotomy or conventional drilling and provides an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.	es
dc.subject	ameloblastoma	es
dc.subject	ameloblastic carcinoma	es
dc.subject	caveolin-1	es
dc.subject	immunohistochemistry	es
dc.subject	real-time polymerase chain reaction	es
dc.title	Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling:systematic review and meta-analysis	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.4317/medoral.24146	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.identifier.url	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7980295/