NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery:a split-mouth clinical study

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery:a split-mouth clinical study

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

dc.contributor.author Gulnahar, Yakup es
dc.contributor.author Alpan, Aysan Lektemur es
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-16T08:36:39Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-16T08:36:39Z
dc.date.issued 2021 es
dc.identifier.citation Gulnahar, Y., & Alpan, AL. (2021). Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study. En Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal (pp. e269-e275). Medicina Oral, S.L. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24085 es
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88021
dc.description.abstract The extraction of impacted third molar teeth is a common procedure in maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to compare of piezoelectric surgical technique with the one with conventional rotary instruments in terms of edema, trismus and pain, in mandibular third molar surgery. 20 individuals with symmetrically impacted lower mandibular third molars and 40 teeth were included in the study. Third molars on the left side of each patient were removed with piezosurgery, while the counterparts on the right side were removed with conventional rotary instruments. Postoperatively, the same antibiotic, analgesic, and mouthwash were recommended to both groups. Ultrasound, edema, trismus measurements were performed before surgery, postoperative, postoperative day 2 and postoperative day 7. VAS scale was used to evaluate the pain. The average age of 20 individuals included in the study was found to be 21.85 ± 3.08 years. The operation time of the individuals who underwent the surgery with conventional rotary instruments was found to be 12 minutes 31.70 ± 167.03 seconds, and the operation time in the Piezosurgery group was 19 minutes 10.60 ± 306.59 seconds. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of trismus, edema, and pain. Piezosurgery is a safe method that can be used in molar removal, but in this split-mouth study, it is not found advantageous in terms of postoperative morbidity due to the longer working time compared to the one performed with conventional rotary instruments. es
dc.subject dental implants es
dc.subject maxillary sinus es
dc.subject sinus lift es
dc.subject mucous retention cyst es
dc.subject pseudocyst es
dc.title Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery:a split-mouth clinical study es
dc.type journal article es_ES
dc.subject.unesco UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS es
dc.identifier.doi 10.4317/medoral.24085 es
dc.type.hasVersion VoR es_ES
dc.identifier.url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141306/

Visualització       (1.240Mb)

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)

Mostra el registre parcial de l'element

Cerca a RODERIC

Cerca avançada

Visualitza

Estadístiques