NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

Systematic mapping review of interventions to prevent blood loss, infection and relapse in orthognathic surgery

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

Systematic mapping review of interventions to prevent blood loss, infection and relapse in orthognathic surgery

dc.contributor.author	Bendersky, Josefina	es
dc.contributor.author	Uribe, Macarena	es
dc.contributor.author	Bravo, Maximiliano	es
dc.contributor.author	Vargas, Juan Pablo	es
dc.contributor.author	Villanueva, Julio	es
dc.contributor.author	Urrutia, Gerard	es
dc.contributor.author	Bonfill, X.	es
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-16T08:36:53Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-16T08:36:53Z
dc.date.issued	2023	es
dc.identifier.citation	Bendersky, J., Uribe, M., Bravo, M., Vargas, JP., Villanueva, J., Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2023). Systematic mapping review of interventions to prevent blood loss, infection and relapse in orthognathic surgery. En Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal (pp. e116-e125). Medicina Oral, S.L. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25530	es
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88181
dc.description.abstract	This systematic mapping review aims to identify, describe, and organize the currently available evidence in systematic reviews (SR) and primary studies regarding orthognathic surgery (OS) co-interventions and surgical modalities, focusing on the outcomes blood loss, infection and relapse. A comprehensive search strategy was performed to identify all SRs, randomized controlled trials and observational studies that evaluate surgical modalities and perioperative co-interventions in OS that evaluate the outcomes blood loss, infection and relapse, regardless of language or publication date. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Lilacs, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. In addition, grey literature was screened. 27 SRs and 150 primary studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 91 from SRs, and 59 from our search strategy. Overall, the quality of the SRs was graded as ?Critically low,? and only two SRs were rated as ?High? quality. 11 PICO questions were extracted from SRs and 31 from primary studies, which focused on osteosynthesis methods, surgical cutting devices, use of antibiotics, and induced hypotension. In addition, evidence bubble maps for each outcome were created to analyze in a visual manner the existing evidence. Future primary and secondary high-quality research should be addressed focused on the eight knowledge gaps identified in this mapping review. We concluded that the evidence mapping approach is a practical methodology for organizing the current evidence and identifying knowledge gaps in OS, helping to reduce research waste and canalize future efforts in developing studies for unsolved questions.	es
dc.subject	mucocutaneous diseases	es
dc.subject	head and neck	es
dc.subject	oral lesion	es
dc.subject	lichen planus	es
dc.subject	lupus erythematosus	es
dc.subject	pemphigus	es
dc.subject	pemphigoid	es
dc.title	Systematic mapping review of interventions to prevent blood loss, infection and relapse in orthognathic surgery	es
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS	es
dc.identifier.doi	10.4317/medoral.25530	es
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.identifier.url	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985940/