NAGIOS: RODERIC FUNCIONANDO

A comparative analysis of two immersive virtual reality systems in the integration and visualization of natural hand interaction

Repositori DSpace/Manakin

IMPORTANT: Aquest repositori està en una versió antiga des del 3/12/2023. La nova instal.lació está en https://roderic.uv.es/

A comparative analysis of two immersive virtual reality systems in the integration and visualization of natural hand interaction

dc.contributor.author	Molina, Guillermo
dc.contributor.author	Gimeno, Jesús
dc.contributor.author	Portalés, Cristina
dc.contributor.author	Casas, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned	2023-06-21T10:53:27Z
dc.date.available	2023-06-22T04:45:05Z
dc.date.issued	2022	es_ES
dc.identifier.citation	Molina, G., Gimeno, J., Portalés, C., & Casas, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of two immersive virtual reality systems in the integration and visualization of natural hand interaction. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81 (6), 7733-7758.	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10550/88403
dc.description.abstract	It is generally accepted that the use of natural interaction provides a positive impact in Virtual Reality (VR) applications. Therefore, it is important to understand what is the best way to integrate and visualize this feature in VR. For this reason, this paper presents a comparative study of the integration of natural hand interaction in two immersive VR systems: a Cave Audio Visual Experience (CAVE) system –where users’ real hands are visible– and a non-see-through Head-Mounted Display (HMD) system –where only a virtual representation of the hands is possible–. In order to test the suitability of using this type of interaction in a CAVE and compare it to an HMD, we raise six research questions related to task performance, usability and perception differences regarding natural hand interaction with these two systems. To answer these questions, we designed an experiment where users have to complete a pick-and-place task with virtual balls and a text-typing task with virtual keyboards. In both systems, the same tracking technology, based on a Leap Motion device, was used. To the best of our knowledge this is the first academic work addressing a comparison of this type. Objective and subjective data were collected during the experiments. The results show that the HMD has a performance, preference and usability advantage over the CAVE with respect to the integration of natural hand interaction. Nevertheless, the results also show that the CAVE system can be, as well, successfully used in combination with an optical hand tracking device.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Springer	es_ES
dc.subject	virtual reality	es_ES
dc.subject	CAVE	es_ES
dc.subject	HMD	es_ES
dc.subject	HTC vive	es_ES
dc.subject	leap motion	es_ES
dc.subject	hand tracking	es_ES
dc.subject	natural interface	es_ES
dc.subject	comparative analysis	es_ES
dc.title	A comparative analysis of two immersive virtual reality systems in the integration and visualization of natural hand interaction	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.subject.unesco	UNESCO::CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s11042-021-11760-9	es_ES
dc.accrualmethod	CI	es_ES
dc.embargo.terms	0 days	es_ES
dc.type.hasVersion	VoR	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES